backlog, memo, roadmap, controls
Interview proof pack
Proof, not positioning.
Three systems. Three kinds of proof. One consistent approach: start with the operator, then build for trust and use.
The evidence
What is real, what is a prototype, and what stays private.
adopted scheduling recommendations
public outcome signal
scoring, QA, and follow-up loops
Three systems / three kinds of proof
Start with the adopted workflow.
Then read the prototype and private-system stories for a fuller view of how I work.
AI-Assisted Basketball Scheduling Decision Workflow
A staff-facing basketball scheduling workflow that turns messy NCAA data and selection-committee constraints into repeatable decision support.
Read Basketball Scheduling case studyAI Implementation OS
A demo-ready prototype that turns messy discovery notes into a reviewable AI implementation package.
Read AI Implementation OS case studyJob Search HQ
A private career pipeline operations system for sourcing, scoring, QA, follow-up, and human-reviewed decisions.
Read Job Search HQ case studyStraight ownership framing
I own the workflow judgment. AI accelerates the build.
Problem definition, workflow design, evaluation criteria, source selection, validation, rollout, user feedback, adoption, and outcome framing.
Code, app structure, scripts, UI wiring, parsing, tests, and iteration support. I stayed accountable for whether the workflow was useful and honest.
Best-fit work
Where this proof travels.
- AI Outcomes / AI Adoption Manager
- GTM Engineer, AI Workflow Automation
- AI Implementation / Strategy Consultant
- Internal AI Enablement Manager
- AI Sales Ops / RevOps Automation
- Healthcare AI Implementation
Working boundary
What I am—and am not—claiming.
- Best fit is implementation, enablement, customer workflow, and adoption work
- Coding-heavy work was built with AI coding assistance
- Best work happens close to operators, customers, messy workflows, and adoption