Interview proof pack

Proof, not positioning.

Three systems. Three kinds of proof. One consistent approach: start with the operator, then build for trust and use.

The evidence

What is real, what is a prototype, and what stays private.

AI implementation package 4 outputs

backlog, memo, roadmap, controls

BYU schedule NCSOS 293 -> 59

adopted scheduling recommendations

BYU schedule NET 46 -> 9

public outcome signal

Reviewable ops system Human-gated

scoring, QA, and follow-up loops

Three systems / three kinds of proof

Start with the adopted workflow.

Then read the prototype and private-system stories for a fuller view of how I work.

Synthetic schedule builder using public-safe demo data.
Sports Analytics / Decision Support

AI-Assisted Basketball Scheduling Decision Workflow

A staff-facing basketball scheduling workflow that turns messy NCAA data and selection-committee constraints into repeatable decision support.

AI-assisted workflowanalyticsbriefings
Read Basketball Scheduling case study
Synthetic intake workspace using fake Northstar discovery context.
AI Implementation / Client Delivery Prototype

AI Implementation OS

A demo-ready prototype that turns messy discovery notes into a reviewable AI implementation package.

AI implementationdiscovery intakegovernance
Read AI Implementation OS case study
Synthetic dashboard captured from demo mode; no private job-search records are shown.
AI Workflow / Career Pipeline Operations

Job Search HQ

A private career pipeline operations system for sourcing, scoring, QA, follow-up, and human-reviewed decisions.

workflow designreview queuesdocument QA
Read Job Search HQ case study

Straight ownership framing

I own the workflow judgment. AI accelerates the build.

What I owned

Problem definition, workflow design, evaluation criteria, source selection, validation, rollout, user feedback, adoption, and outcome framing.

What AI assisted with

Code, app structure, scripts, UI wiring, parsing, tests, and iteration support. I stayed accountable for whether the workflow was useful and honest.

Best-fit work

Where this proof travels.

  • AI Outcomes / AI Adoption Manager
  • GTM Engineer, AI Workflow Automation
  • AI Implementation / Strategy Consultant
  • Internal AI Enablement Manager
  • AI Sales Ops / RevOps Automation
  • Healthcare AI Implementation

Working boundary

What I am—and am not—claiming.

  • Best fit is implementation, enablement, customer workflow, and adoption work
  • Coding-heavy work was built with AI coding assistance
  • Best work happens close to operators, customers, messy workflows, and adoption